Public Perception of Human Enhancement Technologies

Introduction

Throughout the history of scientific research, the goal has always been to enhance human capabilities beyond natural limitations. Technology has allowed us to make our lives better through personalized medications, gene editing, Aesthetic surgery, neural implants, bionic prosthetics, and the Human-Machine interface.

With advanced studies in biomedical engineering, pharmaceuticals, neurotechnology, and nanotechnology, there is the potential to create a future where we can cure physical abnormalities or intervene for aesthetic purposes. Wearable biosensors, for instance, can help athletes improve their performance, wearable biosensors can measure fluctuating insulin levels for diabetic patients, and augmented reality glasses can assist medical professionals in surgical simulations. Cognitive implants, which are non-invasive tech implanted in the brain, can improve memory and cognitive abilities. Micro-chipping for wireless transactions, without the need of phone or cards. All of these innovations have the potential to improve our quality of life and expand the boundaries of what is achievable. 

As these advancements are made, it's important to hear the public's detailed reflections on their opinions, fears, and acceptability of these technologies. It must be acknowledged that these technological advancements have the potential to give rise to ethical and moral dilemmas since there are presently no regulatory laws in effect. 

This survey aims to contribute to public awareness for educational purposes, evaluate ethical concerns, leverage entrepreneurs, researchers and innovators addressing societal expectations, and aid public health sector development and policymakers in the development of governance law.  

Methodology

A cross-sectional survey aims to contribute to a more holistic understanding of public viewpoints, concerns, and values regarding human enhancement technologies in Pakistan, while also shedding light on the population's overall scientific literacy on modern advancements.

Objectives 

Ø  The aim is to assess the level of public awareness regarding Human Enhancement Technologies. This involves exploring different perspectives on their acceptance, as well as the perceived benefits and risks associated with them.

Ø  Additionally, gathering opinions on implantation technology, such as cognitive enhancers and genetic modifications, is crucial.

Ø  Identifying socio-ethical and religious-ethical concerns related to HET.

Ø  Analyze factors that influence people's opinions. This involves investigating demographic background, education, technical knowledge, and cultural influences.

References

1.       Dijkstra, A. M., & Schuijff, M. (2016). Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate: A review study. Public Understanding of Science, 25(5), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514566748

2.       Shan, G. (2023). Exploring the intersection of equipment design and human physical ability: Leveraging biomechanics, ergonomics/anthropometry, and wearable technology for enhancing human physical performance. Advanced Design Research, 1(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadr.2023.04.001 

3.       Yasemin J. Erden, & Philip Brey. (2021). Promoting ethics for human enhancement technologies: SIENNA project Policy Brief #5 (1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4633510 

4.       Bloomfield, B., & Dale, K. (2015). Fit for work? Redefining ‘Normal’ and ‘Extreme’ through human enhancement technologies. Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415572507 

5.       Shao, S., Wu, J., & Zhou, Q. (2021). Developments and challenges in human performance enhancement technology. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices, 12, 100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2021.100095

 By: Zobiya Ameen